RIVN Holdings, Inc. (RIVN)vs BABA Holdings, Inc. (BABA)

Quick verdict

RIVN Holdings, Inc. (RIVN) and BABA Holdings, Inc. (BABA) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, RIVN scores 1 and BABA scores 5. BABA looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while RIVN grows faster and BABA earns higher returns on capital. Overall, BABA edges this comparison, but the right pick depends on whether you prioritise value, growth, income or balance-sheet safety.

2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

Business model and revenue mix

RIVN Holdings, Inc. operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while BABA Holdings, Inc. sits in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). The two operate in different sectors, so cyclicality and end-market exposure differ — factor that into any portfolio overlap. RIVN carries a beta of 1.30 versus 1.84 for BABA, meaning BABA has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, BABA is the cheaper stock. RIVN trades on a forward P/E of n/a and EV/EBITDA of 30.01, against 22.12 and 21.41 for BABA. Price-to-sales is 21.89 vs 13.99, and free-cash-flow yield is 1.1% vs 3.3%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Growth profile

RIVN is the faster grower. RIVN has compounded revenue at 35.2% over three years with EPS growth of 41.2%, while BABA has delivered 5.1% revenue and 8.1% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, BABA is stronger. RIVN posts a 1.0% operating margin, -15.0% return on equity and -5.0% return on invested capital. BABA posts 41.7%, 23.1% and 22.4% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Balance-sheet risk

BABA has the safer balance sheet. RIVN carries net-debt/EBITDA of -1.26x with a current ratio of 2.87, versus -2.45x and 2.91 for BABA. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year RIVN returned 99.3% against 114.9% for BABA; on a three-year annualised basis it is -1.2% vs 41.6%. RIVN yields 2.1% and BABA yields 2.3%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, BABA is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer RIVN, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward BABA for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour BABA for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

• Value: BABA
• Growth: RIVN
• Income: BABA
• Quality: BABA

Frequently asked questions

Is RIVN or BABA the better buy right now?

Neither is universally "better." RIVN scores 1 and BABA scores 5 on our six-factor framework. BABA is cheaper, RIVN grows faster, and BABA is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.

Which stock is cheaper, RIVN or BABA?

BABA is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (n/a vs 22.12), EV/EBITDA (30.01 vs 21.41) and price-to-sales (21.89 vs 13.99).

Which has grown faster, RIVN or BABA?

RIVN has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of 35.2% for RIVN versus 5.1% for BABA.

Which stock pays a bigger dividend?

RIVN yields 2.1% and BABA yields 2.3%, so BABA is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

• AMZN vs BABA
• AMZN vs RIVN
• RIVN vs LCID
• TSLA vs BABA
• TSLA vs RIVN