SMCI Holdings, Inc. (SMCI)vs QCOM Holdings, Inc. (QCOM)

Quick verdict

SMCI Holdings, Inc. (SMCI) and QCOM Holdings, Inc. (QCOM) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, SMCI scores 1 and QCOM scores 5. QCOM looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while QCOM grows faster and QCOM earns higher returns on capital. Overall, QCOM edges this comparison, but the right pick depends on whether you prioritise value, growth, income or balance-sheet safety.

2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

Business model and revenue mix

SMCI Holdings, Inc. operates in Drug Manufacturers (Healthcare), while QCOM Holdings, Inc. sits in Software—Infrastructure (Technology). The two operate in different sectors, so cyclicality and end-market exposure differ — factor that into any portfolio overlap. SMCI carries a beta of 1.65 versus 1.14 for QCOM, meaning SMCI has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, QCOM is the cheaper stock. SMCI trades on a forward P/E of n/a and EV/EBITDA of 15.52, against n/a and 12.51 for QCOM. Price-to-sales is 19.57 vs 1.25, and free-cash-flow yield is 0.6% vs 1.2%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Growth profile

QCOM is the faster grower. SMCI has compounded revenue at -4.3% over three years with EPS growth of -5.6%, while QCOM has delivered 10.8% revenue and 10.4% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, QCOM is stronger. SMCI posts a -13.0% operating margin, -18.3% return on equity and -5.1% return on invested capital. QCOM posts -7.8%, -15.3% and -11.5% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Balance-sheet risk

SMCI has the safer balance sheet. SMCI carries net-debt/EBITDA of -0.86x with a current ratio of 2.88, versus 1.67x and 2.20 for QCOM. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year SMCI returned -1.4% against 63.1% for QCOM; on a three-year annualised basis it is 0.8% vs 13.4%. SMCI yields 3.2% and QCOM yields 2.4%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, QCOM is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer QCOM, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward QCOM for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour QCOM for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

• Value: QCOM
• Growth: QCOM
• Income: QCOM
• Quality: QCOM

Frequently asked questions

Is SMCI or QCOM the better buy right now?

Neither is universally "better." SMCI scores 1 and QCOM scores 5 on our six-factor framework. QCOM is cheaper, QCOM grows faster, and QCOM is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.

Which stock is cheaper, SMCI or QCOM?

QCOM is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (n/a vs n/a), EV/EBITDA (15.52 vs 12.51) and price-to-sales (19.57 vs 1.25).

Which has grown faster, SMCI or QCOM?

QCOM has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of -4.3% for SMCI versus 10.8% for QCOM.

Which stock pays a bigger dividend?

SMCI yields 3.2% and QCOM yields 2.4%, so QCOM is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

• AAPL vs QCOM
• AAPL vs SMCI
• AMD vs QCOM
• AMD vs SMCI
• AVGO vs QCOM
• AVGO vs SMCI