Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)vs Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD)

Quick verdict

Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, TSLA scores 4 and AMD scores 2. TSLA looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while AMD grows faster and TSLA earns higher returns on capital. Overall, TSLA edges this comparison, but the right pick depends on whether you prioritise value, growth, income or balance-sheet safety.

2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

Business model and revenue mix

Tesla, Inc. operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. sits in Semiconductors (Technology). The two operate in different sectors, so cyclicality and end-market exposure differ — factor that into any portfolio overlap. TSLA carries a beta of 1.25 versus 0.75 for AMD, meaning TSLA has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, TSLA is the cheaper stock. TSLA trades on a forward P/E of 26.25 and EV/EBITDA of 11.17, against 10.72 and 11.56 for AMD. Price-to-sales is 13.28 vs 18.95, and free-cash-flow yield is 4.5% vs 6.5%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Growth profile

AMD is the faster grower. TSLA has compounded revenue at 4.0% over three years with EPS growth of 5.0%, while AMD has delivered 16.4% revenue and 10.3% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, TSLA is stronger. TSLA posts a 28.6% operating margin, 23.0% return on equity and 24.1% return on invested capital. AMD posts 28.6%, 11.8% and 34.5% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Balance-sheet risk

TSLA has the safer balance sheet. TSLA carries net-debt/EBITDA of 1.01x with a current ratio of 3.57, versus 1.19x and 3.29 for AMD. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year TSLA returned 19.9% against 8.3% for AMD; on a three-year annualised basis it is 47.7% vs -2.0%. TSLA yields 0.4% and AMD yields 3.5%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, TSLA is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer AMD, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward AMD for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour TSLA for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

• Value: TSLA
• Growth: AMD
• Income: AMD
• Quality: TSLA

Frequently asked questions

Is TSLA or AMD the better buy right now?

Neither is universally "better." TSLA scores 4 and AMD scores 2 on our six-factor framework. TSLA is cheaper, AMD grows faster, and TSLA is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.

Which stock is cheaper, TSLA or AMD?

TSLA is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (26.25 vs 10.72), EV/EBITDA (11.17 vs 11.56) and price-to-sales (13.28 vs 18.95).

Which has grown faster, TSLA or AMD?

AMD has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of 4.0% for TSLA versus 16.4% for AMD.

Which stock pays a bigger dividend?

TSLA yields 0.4% and AMD yields 3.5%, so AMD is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

• AAPL vs AMD
• AAPL vs TSLA
• AMD vs AVGO
• AMD vs CRM
• AMD vs INTC
• AMD vs IONQ